Azərbaycan Milli Elmlər Akademiyası
İnsan resursları və elmmetrik məlumatlar bazası
Profil

Əliağa Məmmədli

ANAS_2132
Elmi fəaliyyət
Qeyd: Elmi işlərin xülasələri əsasında süni intellekt (Gemini AI) tətbiqi ilə tərtib olunmuşdur
Ümumi xülasə (AI):
Professor Əliağa Məmmədli, tarix elmləri doktoru, Arxeologiya və Antropologiya İnstitutunun Antropologiya Mərkəzinin müdiri vəzifəsində çalışır. Onun elmi fəaliyyəti əsasən etnik kimlik, milli kimlik və millətçilik mövzularına yönəlmişdir. Google Scholar profilinə görə, Məmmədlinin 26 sitat gətirilməsi, 3 H-indeksi, 1 i10-indeksi və 6 nəşri vardır. Onun əsas tədqiqat sahələrinə Azərbaycan milli kimliyinin qurulması, sərhəd bölgələrində kimlik məsələləri və Sovet dövrü antropologiyası daxildir. Professor Məmmədli, qloballaşma və inteqrasiya şəraitində etnik kimliyə artan marağı, eləcə də milli kimliyin formalaşmasında sərhədlərin rolunu araşdırır. Onun elmi işləri, millətçiliyə dair müxtəlif nəzəri yanaşmaları, o cümlədən primordialist, modernist və etnosimvolist yanaşmaları əhatə edir.
Professor Aliagha Mammadli, Doctor of Historical Sciences, serves as the Head of the Anthropology Department at the Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology. His scholarly work primarily focuses on ethnic identity, national identity, and nationalism. According to his Google Scholar profile, Mammadli has 26 citations, an h-index of 3, an i10-index of 1, and 6 publications. His main research areas include the construction of Azerbaijani national identity, identity issues in border regions, and Soviet-era anthropology. Professor Mammadli investigates the increasing interest in ethnic identity in the context of globalization and integration, as well as the role of borders in the formation of national identity. His research encompasses various theoretical approaches to nationalism, including primordialist, modernist, and ethnosymbolist perspectives.
Профессор Алиага Мамедли, доктор исторических наук, является заведующим Отделом антропологии Института археологии и антропологии. Его научная работа в основном посвящена этнической идентичности, национальной идентичности и национализму. Согласно его профилю в Google Scholar, Мамедли имеет 26 цитирований, индекс Хирша 3, индекс i10 1 и 6 публикаций. Его основные области исследований включают построение азербайджанской национальной идентичности, вопросы идентичности в приграничных регионах и антропологию советской эпохи. Профессор Мамедли исследует растущий интерес к этнической идентичности в контексте глобализации и интеграции, а также роль границ в формировании национальной идентичности. Его исследования охватывают различные теоретические подходы к национализму, включая примордиалистский, модернистский и этносимволистский подходы.
Tədqiqat maraqları (AI):
Antropologiya, Etnologiya, Milli kimlik inşası, Azərbaycan tarixi, Siyasi antropologiya
İxtisas sahələri (AI):
Antropologiya, Etnologiya, Milli kimlik inşası, Azərbaycan tarixi, Siyasi antropologiya
Şəxsi məlumatlar
Tam Adı:
Əliağa Əyyub oğlu Məmmədli
Elmi dərəcə:
Tarix elmləri doktoru
Elmi ad:
Professor
Təvəllüd:
Ünvan:
Telefon:
Email:
İş yeri məlumatları
Təşkilat / Şöbə:
Arxeologiya və Antropologiya İnstitutu / Antropologiya Mərkəzi
Vəzifə:
Şöbə müdiri
Əsas iş yeri:
Bəli
İşləmə müddəti:
1 Yanvar 2024 – H/h
Elmi işlərin siyahısı
İşin adı Jurnalın adı, Nəşriyyat, cild, N Müəlliflər İstinad sayı Nəşr tarixi Abstrakt və oxşar məqalələr

Tarix Ümumi Məqalə sayı Ümumi İstinad sayı h index i10 index
1 Noyabr 2025 6 26 3 1
1 Oktyabr 2025 6 26 3 1
1 Sentyabr 2025 6 26 3 1
1 Avqust 2025 6 26 3 1
1 İyul 2025 6 26 3 1
1 İyun 2025 6 25 3 1
1 May 2025 6 25 3 1
1 Aprel 2025 6 25 3 1
1 Mart 2025 6 24 2 1
1 Fevral 2025 5 10 2 0
1 Yanvar 2025 5 10 2 0
1 Dekabr 2024 5 10 2 0
1 Noyabr 2024 5 10 2 0
1 Oktyabr 2024 5 10 2 0
1 Sentyabr 2024 5 10 2 0
1 Avqust 2024 5 10 2 0
1 İyul 2024 5 10 2 0
1 İyun 2024 5 10 2 0

Content for WOS.
Elmi işlərin siyahısı
İşin adı Jurnalın adı, Nəşriyyat, cild, N Müəlliflər İstinad sayı Nəşr tarixi Abstrakt və oxşar məqalələr
Soviet-Era Anthropology by Azerbaijani Scholars Asia, Exploring the Edge of Empire: Soviet Era Anthropology in the Caucasus and Central Asia səh: 175-196 Aliaga Mammadli 7 2011
Əlaqəli məqalələr(Google)
PECULIARITIES OF THE FORMATION OF AZERBAIJANIS’ETHNIC IDENTITY IN THE SOVIET ERA “AZERBAIJANI” AND BEYOND səh: 61 ALIAGHA MAMMADLI 4 2017 A splash of ethnicity was seen across … A splash of ethnicity was seen across the world at the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st, as globalization and intensive integration developed. Such increases in interest in ethnicity have occurred at different points in the history of mankind. As a rule, they have all happened at breakthrough moments in the history of mankind and, more specifically, upon the appearance or destruction of great powers, technolo gical revolutions and, quite probably, radical changes in the planet’s natural and climatic rhythm. Most often, the factors above have been interconnected and were sometimes a logical continuation of each other. In this case, for example, it is possible to refer to a panorama of consecutive natural-climatic, techno logical and social-political changes in the life of the ancient Turks that led to the massive pressure on them alongside their neighboring ethnic groups, as demonstrated by the famous Russian ethnologist LN Gumilev (1967). All of these complex processes naturally caused a reaction of ethnoses in the form of growth of the importance of the “we-they” antithesis, substan tiating an increase in the consolidation of the ethnical community.The phenomenon of ethnicity, which has been observed in many parts of the world in recent decades, appears to have had several causes, most significant of which are: a) ethnical elites aiming to eliminate historical, social-political and economic infringements that ethnical communities endured under colonial empires and poly-ethnic states; and b) ethnical-cultural communities’ reactions to objective processes pertaining to a tech- Daha çox
Əlaqəli məqalələr(Google)
“AZERBAIJANI” AND BEYOND Perspectives on the Construction of National Identity Aliaga Mammadli, Adeline Braux, Ceyhun Mahmudlu 1 2017 “AZERBAIJANI” AND BEYOND Aliaga Mammadli, Adeline Braux, … “AZERBAIJANI” AND BEYOND Aliaga Mammadli, Adeline Braux, Ceyhun Mahmudlu “AZERBAIJANI” AND BEYOND Perspectives on the Construction of National Identity “AZERBAIJANI” AND BEYOND Perspectives on the Construction of National Identity Page 2 EDITED BY: Aliaga Mammadli, Adeline Braux, Ceyhun Mahmudlu Page 3 3 CONTENT About the Editors and Contributors 5 Preface 10 Introduction: Deconstructing the ‘Crossroads’ 13 I. Historical Perspective on the Formation of National Identity in Azerbaijan 36 1. Azerbaijani Turks: from Islamism to Turkism Aydin Balayev 37 2. Peculiarities of the Formation of Azerbaijanis’ Ethnic Identity in the Soviet Era Aliaga Mammadli 61 3. The National Revival in Azerbaijan Prior to the Fall of the Soviet Union and “Black January” Shamkhal Abilov and Ismayil Isayev 87 II. Theoretical Explanation 123 4. Theorizing Nation Building in Azerbaijan Ceyhun Mahmudlu 124 … Daha çox
Əlaqəli məqalələr(Google)
THE AZERBAIJANI COMMUNITY IN RUSSIA: A LOOK AT THE SECOND GENERATION ADELINE BRAUX “AZERBAIJANI” AND BEYOND səh: 152 Aliaga Mammadli 0 0 Bordering processes operate at a number of … Bordering processes operate at a number of scales simulta neously, and not just at the level of the state or inter-state relations. This paper is focused upon the collective experience of one particular group-ethnic Azeris-to official bordering processes by both Georgia and Azerbaijan and examines how bordering processes might influence collective identity in the Azeri minoritypopulated border region of Kvemo Kartli. Interviews with locals, state officials, representatives of non-governmental organizations, focus groups, and participant observation in communities of Kvemo Kartli and in Tbilisi are crucial in order to obtain a more accurate and detailed picture of how bordering processes impact the formation or negotiation of collective identity at the personal and inter-personal levels as well as at larger scales of locales and regions. That said, this paper is the first step in a larger project examining processes of formation and (re) negotiation of collective identity among Georgia’s Azeri population and considers the roles that borders, both physical and abstract, play in such processes.The relationship between borders and the creation, dissemination, and negotiation of collective identity is particularly fascinating when studied in the context of minority populations residing alongside a state’s political borders, especially when titular majority of the neighboring state across this border shares linguistic, religious, and cultural affinities with members of the aforementioned minority group. The majority of Georgia’s Azeri Daha çox
Əlaqəli məqalələr(Google)
THEORIZING NATION BUILDING IN AZERBAIJAN CEYHUN MAHMUDLU “AZERBAIJANI” AND BEYOND səh: 124 Aliaga Mammadli, Adeline Braux 0 0 In academic literature there are three approaches … In academic literature there are three approaches to nationalism: primordial, modernist, and ethnosymbolist. These three approaches differ from each other with respect to the explanation, each provides regarding the emergence and endurance of nationalism, and they disagree on the key variables used to conceptualize the phenomenon. Indeed, primordialists argue that nations have existed throughout human history; modernists associate the nation only with the modern era and reject its existence before this period; ethnosymbolists insist that although nationalism is a modern phenomenon, nations have existed in all times in history. Primordialsts believe that nations are the product of “primordial ties of race, ancestry, religion, language and territory”(Smith, 1984). Modernists emerged as a reaction to primordialism and argue that the nation and nationalism are the products of the last two centuries and are rooted in modern processes such as capitalism, industrialization, and secularism (Ozkirimli, 2010). The ethnosymbolist approach emerged as a result of critiques of modernism. They mainly focus on ethnosymbolic elements that form nations and nationalism. From a historical perspective, nationalism as an ideology entered into the political process in the nineteenth century in particular. Nationalism became popular not only among the titular ethnic groups of national monarchies but also among minorities of the imperial states. Since the construction of the nation mainly depends on the social, political, and historical dynamics of a society, as a matter of fact that process didn’t develop in the general structure for each of these groups. Moreover … Daha çox
Əlaqəli məqalələr(Google)
Theorizing nation building in Azerbaijan Azerbaijani’and Beyond: Perspectives on the Construction of National Identity səh: 124-151 Aliaga Mammadli, Adeline Braux, Ceyhan Mahmudlu 14 2017 In academic literature there are three approaches … In academic literature there are three approaches to natio nalism: primordial, modernist, and ethnosymbolist. These three approaches differ from each other with respect to the explanation each provides regarding the emergence and endurance of nationalism, and they disagree on the key variables used to conceptualize the phenomenon. Indeed, primordialists argue that nations have existed throughout human history; modernists associate the nation only with the modern era and reject its existence before this period; ethnosymbolists insist that although nationalism is a modern phenomenon, nations have existed in all times in history. Primordialsts believe that nations are the product of “primordial ties of race, ancestry, religion, language and territory”(Smith, 1984). Modernists emerged as a reaction to primordialism and argue that the nation and nationalism are the products of the last two centuries and are rooted in modern processes such as capitalism, industrialization, and secularism (Ozkirimli, 2010). The ethnosymbolist approach emerged as a result of critiques of modernism. They mainly focus on ethnosymbolic elements that form nations and nationalism. From a historical perspective, nationalism as an ideology entered into the political process in the nineteenth century in particular. Nationalism became popular not only among the titular ethnic groups of national monarchies but also among minorities of the imperial states. Since the construction of the nation mainly depends on the social, political, and historical dynamics of a society, as a matter of fact that process didn’t develop in the general structure for each of these groups. Moreover … Daha çox
Əlaqəli məqalələr(Google)